J.D. Moorehead, a professor at Florida Coastal School of Law, said Bradley’s legislation would likely survive a court challenge because it addresses the major concern the Supreme Court had.
Soto’s plan to bring back the parole system might be more problematic, although it does make a certain amount of sense to bring back parole for juveniles, Moorehead said.
The most logical step might be to take a hybrid of both bills, give judges the option of life without parole but allow them to impose a lighter sentence, and also let judges decide whether the defendant should be eligible for parole at some point, Moorehead said.
“Judges know the people in front of them best,” he said.
Read more at Jacksonville.com: http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2013-04-06/story/lawmakers-differ-how-fix-juvenile-sentencing-laws#ixzz2PyHf4JR1